This is a new age in law enforcement where police officers in modern policing can not sit by and depend on others when they are under the microscope in an administrative investigation. The role of a use-of-force expert in administrative investigations is pivotal to ensure that the actions taken by law enforcement officers are compliant with existing policies and legal standards. Use of force experts have specialized knowledge about various types of force used by police officers, such as firearms, tasers, batons, and physical restraint techniques. They also understand the relevant laws governing these tools and tactics, including constitutional guidelines and departmental policies (Hough & Tatum, 2012). As such, these experts play a crucial role in analyzing incidents where allegations of excessive or inappropriate use of force arise.
During an administrative investigation into an alleged use of excessive force by a police officer, the expertise of a use-of-force professional helps determine whether the officer's actions were justified under the circumstances. This involves examining factors such as the subject's threat level, the officer's training and experience, and any potential alternatives to de-escalate the situation (Alpert & Smith, 1994). Additionally, use-of-force experts may review video evidence from body-worn cameras or other sources to assess whether official reports accurately depict events. By utilizing their specialized knowledge and skills to analyze each unique case objectively, these experts can provide invaluable insight into whether a particular instance warrants disciplinary action or changes in policy.
Moreover, use-of-force experts significantly enhance transparency and accountability within law enforcement agencies. Public trust in policing has been eroded due to numerous high-profile cases involving controversial uses of force (Nix & Wolfe, 2017). Engaging qualified professionals who can impartially evaluate officers' conduct demonstrates that departments take these matters seriously and are committed to upholding ethical standards. Furthermore, input from independent use-of-force experts may help identify systemic issues in agency training or culture that contribute to problematic behavior.
In addition to providing critical analysis during individual investigations, use-of-force professionals can offer valuable guidance for developing and refining departmental policies on using force. By staying current with best practices, legal precedents, and technological advancements in equipment, these experts can help ensure that agencies adopt sound procedures to minimize risks to officers and civilians (McCluskey et al., 2005). Use-of-force experts can also provide targeted training to officers, addressing specific areas where improvements are needed based on their assessments of prior incidents.
In summary, a use-of-force expert is indispensable in administrative investigations involving allegations of excessive or inappropriate force by law enforcement personnel. These professionals possess specialized knowledge and skills that enable them to analyze complex situations objectively, ensuring that decisions about disciplinary actions or policy changes are grounded in evidence-based understanding. Ultimately, their involvement contributes to greater transparency, accountability, and public trust in policing while promoting safer interactions between officers and the communities they serve. With an increasing focus on police reform and calls for more robust oversight mechanisms, the expertise provided by use-of-force experts will continue to be vital in shaping the future landscape of law enforcement.
Sources:
Alpert, G.P., & Smith, W.C. (1994). How reasonable is the reasonable man?: Police and excessive force. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 85(2), 481–501.
Hough, R.M., & Tatum, K.M. (2012). An examination of Florida policies concerning police use of deadly force. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 35(1), 39–56.
McCluskey, J.D., Terrill, W., Paoline III E.A., & Ingram J.R. (2005). Training evaluation model: Evaluating and improving criminal justice training final report for National Institute of Justice) Washington State University Spokane.
Nix J., Wolfe S.E. (2017). The Impact of Negative Publicity on Police Legitimacy. In: Haberfeld M., Lieberman C. (eds) Police Integrity Management in Australia. Global Crime and Justice. Springer, Cham
Comments