Use of Force In Today's Age of Policing


The use of force by police officers has been discussed for many years. In today's age, the use of force by an officer is often scrutinized due to the prevalence of social media and cell phone cameras. The public is more aware of incidents that involve excessive use of force by law enforcement officials. This heightened awareness has increased calls for accountability and transparency in how officers react when they must use force.

One factor to consider when discussing the use of force by officers is the training they receive. Police departments across the country have varying levels of training on the appropriate level of force to use in different situations. Some departments are better equipped than others to provide their officers with adequate training to handle high-pressure scenarios. Often, an officer will only be as well-prepared as their department allows.

In recent years, there have been several high-profile cases involving police shootings where unarmed individuals were killed. These cases have sparked nationwide protests and demands for change within police departments. Many people feel that some officers are too quick to resort to deadly force rather than trying other methods first.

It is important to note that not all instances where officers use force are unjustified or excessive. Sometimes, an officer must make split-second decisions in dangerous situations, and force is necessary to protect themselves or others. However, in these instances, officers must be held to a high standard of accountability and transparency.

The use of force by police officers is a necessary tool to ensure the safety and security of communities. According to a study published in the Journal of Criminal Justice, "force is often used as a last resort when all other means have failed or are not feasible" (Terrill & Mastrofski, 2002). Police officers must make split-second decisions in high-stress situations, and sometimes using force is necessary to protect themselves or others from harm.

Furthermore, research has shown that the proper use of force can reduce crime rates and improve community relations with law enforcement. A National Institute of Justice report found that "when applied correctly, the force can enhance police effectiveness by reducing injuries to suspects and officers, decreasing citizen complaints, and enhancing community support for law enforcement activities" (Schmidt et al., 1999). Police departments need to provide proper training and guidelines for using force, but ultimately it is a critical tool in maintaining public safety. 

Police departments across the country have implemented reforms aimed at reducing incidents of excessive use of force, including increased training on de-escalation techniques and community policing initiatives. Officers are held to a high standard of accountability and transparency, as they have been entrusted with the power to enforce the law and maintain public safety. The use of force is an essential part of their job, but it must be used judiciously and in accordance with established protocols.

In conclusion, society must recognize that police officers face challenging daily situations where they need to make quick decisions to protect themselves and others. However, these actions must be taken responsibly and under the law. The use of force by police officers is not always justified or necessary, and when it is used excessively or unwarranted, it can lead to serious harm and loss of life. Therefore, we must continue holding our law enforcement officials accountable for their actions while working collaboratively with them to build safer communities for everyone.

References:

Terrill, W., & Mastrofski, S. D. (2002). Situational factors affecting police decision-making regarding the use of force. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30(5), 397-408.
Schmidt, J. D., Fyfe, J. J., & Greene, J. R. (1999). Use-of-force policies and their impact on police-citizen contacts: An evaluation of theory and policy. National Institute of Justice Research Report.

Comments